Some highly puzzling messages were leaked to The Daily Caller from Cassidy Hutchinson reaching out to CPAC, the Conservatives Political Action Conference, for assistance with her “BS” subpoena from the Jan. 6th committee. But what does it mean?
To be honest, I’m not entirely sure, but it confirms a lot of things, and simultaneously raises A LOT of questions. For starters, why the hell is Cassidy Hutchinson reaching out to the conservative Mecca of CPAC, for help with Jan. 6th subpoena? Why would she seek conservative help if her plan was to go up there and fabricate nonsense about Trump. That doesn’t make any sense.
The way I see it, here are the 3 possible scenarios as to WHY Cassidy Hutchinson would reach out to conservatives for help:
1) Hutchinson was looking to infiltrate CPAC lawyers to get information on Jan. 6th defendants, or information to help in her smear testimony against Trump and make CPAC look bad by association. She was looking to sow division and is operating as an agent for the Dems.
2) Hutchinson didn’t want to be involved in the “BS” Jan. 6th hearings, but she was being pressured by the Dems to testify. She was sure to mention that US Marshalls, who are armed at all times, showed up to her house to issue the subpoena. So perhaps she was feeling intimidated or scared about the whole situation. Maybe she’s an unwilling participant in this sham and is being blackmailed or threatened by the Dems.
3) This is a white hat operation to bait the Dems to irrationally subpoena Cassidy Hutchinson, who claims to have the goods to bring down Trump, only for her testimony to be a colossal disaster and exonerate Trump. She’s an agent for Trump/White Hats and is playing a part to deal significant damage to the Dems and their “insurrection” narrative while simultaneously waking up normies.
She’s either involved in one of the two “sides” in this war, or she’s neutral and doesn’t know how she got in this situation and wanted out. Regardless of which option it is, this CONFIRMS that whatever “testimony” she presented is not to be taken at face value and something much deeper is going on here. None of which will reflect well on the Dems.
As for me, I’m leaning heavily to option 3. Simply too much damage being done to the Dems and the left-wing narrative to be an accident. Also Hutchinson reminds me of something we’ve seen many times before. How many people have we seen claiming to have the goods to bring Trump down, only to fall flat on their faces and exonerate Trump? Avenatti, Stormi, Omarosa. All of these similar characters did nothing but discredit the Dems and exonerate Trump. While simultaneously gathering the attention of left-wing media, therefore waking up the sheep to their dishonesty.
Also consider the timing of these “message leaks”. She’s been headline news for how many days now? And whoever had these texts waited until NOW to release them? AFTER the Dems have gone all-in on support for Hutchinson and her comical testimony.
Whether Hutchinson is directly working for the white hats or not, the result of this little stunt only benefitted Trump, and highly damaged the Dems. It makes them look even more dishonest and gimmicky, right in the prime months leading to the mid terms.
If the Deep State were pulling the strings, we wouldn’t see them fumbling this badly.
-Clandestine
https://dailycaller.com/2022/07/03/obtained-text-message-cassidy-hutchinson-called-january-6-committee-bs-before-testifying/
Just joined your substack! As a fellow behavior analyst, I also lean to door number 3 (grew up with Let's Make a Deal).
Let's go BACK to 1963. JFK flipped sides (the Kennedy family weren't a bunch of angels), was vocal about the Enemy Within, and was going to remove the CIA. BANG BANG, two Kennedys were toast and so went MLK and Malcom X. This kept the multi generational "irregular warfare" plan described by KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov full steam ahead.
My point is that the past was operated brilliantly by the infiltrating enemy (Marxist, Communist...use that label for now). It used to be the totalitarian tiptoe (trickle change forward) of making "progressive" (IslamoCommunist) moves that became very clear in the late 60s. Culture was being brilliantly engineered from within: music, movies, education. Credit cards replaced cash; politically correct speech made us all wussies; elections were rigged by "machines" replacing paper ballots (Patel Patriot's interview with Jovan Pulitzer--watch that).
I specialize in NLP, neuro linguistic programming. A model designed in the 70s in how language programs the mind. This is the base of "irregular warfare" (see Richard Higgins who was working for Trump Unconstrained Analysis) which uses "narratives" to control the mind.
The mind can only focus on so much detail at once without writing it down. In NLP, it's called "chunks" and the mind maxes out at nine chunks. You can chunk out the mind by giving it too much stimulation. Thus the human (mind) will use words to keep track of detail--or just toss the detail (stop focusing on it).
Example: a Farm is a label to cover much detail. Factory Farm are two labels that now lead us to a "narrative". America (the West) has been changed by creating narratives that ride the backbone of an issue that a group of people are upset about--and take that group and steer them into a Color Revolution to make changes in society and political control.
I'm introducing a lot here, and this is extremely detailed in the back end. My overall point here is that the above design requires brilliance. What happened to the brilliant people within the Yuri Bezmenov's evil infiltrator's side?
Many of us researchers are asking this. The brilliant yet evil machinations of the past 60+ years are gone. I suspect the smart people died out (got old) and the younger generation that has taken over are the Hunter Bidens of that class--coke snorting hedonistic idiots. I see this all over society BTW.
Much arrogance is amongst this Hunter Biden self entitled group of behind the curtain elites that were handed the keys to the James Bond "SPECTRE" machine. Watch or read the early James Bond. Ian Fleming was writing about his experience in the spy business.
So while I am leading to option 3, the manic hubris of these evil people will be their end.
***A year ago, a friend of a friend billionaire...one of those guys, told me that these evil people don't believe they will EVER be brought to justice (legal system) thus they don't care if they are "seen".
However, I agree with Clandestine and Patel Patriot that there IS a "devolution" going on by observing the behavior.
Well done, Clandestine!
It's a strange one, I agree. One would think the Unselect Committee would do a serious background check on anyone claiming to have anything against Trump, just to avoid scenarios like this. Surely they must have had some dry runs in a mock court? That's basic law 101.
Thanks again for the insight, Clandestine. God Bless!