7 Comments
User's avatar
Matthew Koch's avatar

For Netanyahu, this is all about regime change. I really don’t think that it has anything to do with Iran’s nuclear program deep down.

Expand full comment
Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

The two are intertwined. The mullahs need the threat of the bomb to be credible, I think.

Expand full comment
Keith Capolino's avatar

Comments/Observations:

Israel is no friend of anyone's. Netanyahu is a criminal.

If I am correct, isn't Iran the fastest growing area of Christianity?

I am greater than 50% in the belief that nuclear weapons are a hoax, (save it, do your own research) if that is true, then plug that into your equation as to why.

Question: Do the Rothchilds control Iran's banking system yet?

Things to consider...

But, who knows these days??

Expand full comment
From the Beach...🌞🇧🇷🏖️🌊🐬🌎😎's avatar

Let's see what happens. The US has military assets in the area. A carrier, I believe. Were the carrier to be attacked, the US Navy would suffer loses and ......???

Expand full comment
Matthew Koch's avatar

USS Liberty Part Deux…

Expand full comment
BigGuy49's avatar

There are so many disingenuous players "over there" (including some elements of Israel) that an attack on any US warship or other military would need to be accurately "sourced" before any retaliatory actions were taken. Remember also that Iran has "proxies" who operate outside of Iran but who also are less circumspect than Iran about taking offensive actions. So IMHO it requires us to "wait and see" before we start demanding missiles and bombs to fall...

Expand full comment
Slimbippy's avatar

Note to Trump, it's easy to be a tough guy when your adversary is being held up getting his ass kicked. (I think that is a version of the Fonzy rule.) The US built a bomb especially to destroy these super deep, hardened bunkers. (Or supposedly they did.) It's time to dust a couple off and use them or ask Israel if they want to borrow them.

Expand full comment